Impact of London Hosting the 2012 Olympics

Impact of capital of the United Kingdom Hosting the 2012 exceedingsLondon 2012s ambition is to spend a penny a Games for every 1, w present everyone is invited to take part, join in and enjoy the most fire yield in the valet ( www.london2012.com ). This is a laudable aim for those who argon charged with the responsibility for producing the Games in London. The aim of this study is to look at the potential impact of hosting the Games for Britain and how this rebounds the political orientation of those who atomic number 18 running it.In prescribe to pass judgment the potential impact of the Games on Britain, one deprivations to check over the mastery or otherwise of other major variation outlets that see been acquaintd in the past. The most nonable or should I grade notorious failure in cost of the Olympics was the Montreal Games Henry Aubin, a Canadian bargon-assedspaper columnist commented that the Games had been a financial disaster. There has not been a sin gle successful bequest of the Olympics (from Evening criterion, Nov. 2006). The event itself was poorly organize from the start, with the result that it took the organisers thirty years to pay for the Games in their entirety this is something that passkey Coe and his team need to bear in mind.In more new- do times, Olympic Games gull been run much more efficiently and stand left not only a financi onlyy demonstrable mark, solely similarly left a legacy in call of facilities and stinting benefits which reflected not only the efforts but the ideology of those who were in charge. In Barcelona the citizenry of the city and indeed the Spanish nation as a wholly were tortuous in the project. The organisers realised that they needed the allhearted support of the passel, especially the citizens of Barcelona. Their attention to detail was very mind-boggling, even work through to inviting comments to be made about road improvements before going ahead with them to give the lo t a sense of ownership of the developments that were taking place. The ideology that is be reflected here is that the Games are for everyone and that all give the sack flip an active part in its ultimate success (or failure). The city already had a good bed that was imperative about it before plans to hold the Games began, not least a hugely successful football team in Barcelona FC a foresightful with their impressive stadium. The organisers bring outed the need for urban redevelopment to proffer better facilities for the peck in terms of bluster, leisure, art, media, housing and headation. Their other concern was to develop the tourist work by improving the overall image of the city and the surrounding worlds. It was observable that there was a actualize strategy for the post-event use of this area, which has subsequently flummox part of the citys tourist attractions and as such(prenominal), seems to have had a positive tack on the city (Roche 2000, P 145). The phil osophy was clear from the outset the desire to provide an excellent Games to reflect well on the city at the same time as providing benefits for the people of Barcelona in the long term through redevelopment and through touristry. The organising committee commented that the choose beneficiaries are the citizens of Barcelona whose surroundings have been immeasurably improved (Roche 2000, P 144). This logical argument is borne out by the physical improvements that were left in the city a new waterfront and residential area, a new international airport, two new skyline communication towers, six new sports stadia (with another being extensively refurbished), a new museum of contemporary art, a remodel take Catalonian arts museum and new media facilities. Roche (2000, P 144) concludes that the social policy aim was successfully achieved through, among other things, the new sports facilities, transport and housing built in a deprived city area.The aims of the organisers of the Manche ster commonwealth games were along similar lines, to leave a lasting legacy of dissolute facilities and social, physical and economic regeneration (www.gameslegacy.co.uk). The ideology of the political science activity and the local organisers was one of progressive development crosswise a amount of areas through phone investment, marketing, planning and implementation. The New eastside Manchester Partnership aimed to double the local population, to shape new homes, to cr burye a new town centre with a large area for retail provision, to create a line of reasoning super acid and to construct a 100 million sports complex with a 48,000 qualification stadium. The Sportcity complex includes the City of Manchester Stadium, the Regional Athletics Arena, the national Squash Centre, the bailiwick Cycling Centre, the Regional Tennis Centre, the English Institute of Sport and legion(predicate) hotels, bars, cafes, restaurants and a superstore. The benefits of this complex alone include 151 million investment in sports and leisure- a large amount of which was secured from Sport England (165 million disjointed between facilities construction and the provision for the athletes themselves), local people being involved in building the venues, community access guaranteed through targeted sessions at the venues, facilities being made available to local schools and clubs as well as people being trained as local sports coaches. The translateational impact of Sportcity, in specific in re-positioning East Manchester as an attractive area to invest, would not have been possible without the Games (Manchester City Council from www.gameslegacy.co.uk). Over the next fifteen years the area expects to attract in the region of 2 billion of investment from two the private and public sectors as a direct result of re-create the Games and enabling people to rediscover Manchester as both a business and tourist destination.Both of these events and the subsequent positive so lvents that have been seen and matt-up by the community and the nation have led there to be a drive to stage further large events either in the country or even in the cities themselves. These successful ventures have led to an increase desire for the feel good factor that is generated to be desire a elaboration. The communities in both Barcelona and Manchester fully supported the events that were being staged, which was evidenced by the huge demand for tickets for both Games. Hence both Spain and the United demesne have bid to host subsequent major events, with London securing the 2012 Olympic Games.The reasons behind the London bid for the Olympics are many. The bid began with the vision of the British Olympic Committee who tangle that following the success of the Manchester Commonwealth games in terms of planning and eventual delivery, a credible case could be made for London to host the 2012 Games. The Mayor of London and the government were advance to see the vision for the succeeding(a) of sport in the United solid ground and strategies were developed and deployed around regeneration, legacy, employment, tourism, new housing and health of the nation (www.olympics.org.uk). The ideology that is displayed here is one of community, encouraging the nation to take part in a global sporting event just for the event in itself but in addition for the improvement of the nation in a number of ways the kudos of running a global event would put the United Kingdom in the spotlight and potentially lead to unlike investment for the economic betterment of the country as a whole the opportunities for employment both pre and post Games the chance to enhance the lives of those in the East End of London through the provision of new housing and sports facilities as well as the regeneration of a very run down area of the capital the opportunity to improve the health of the nation as a whole (particularly its children) through increased awareness of sporting opportunit ies provided across the country and through a better understanding of the need to eat a healthy diet. There is also the direct sporting legacy which ordain exist as a result of the provision of world tell apart facilities which stool be accessed by both elect athletes and the ecumenical public. The ideas could not solely be chemical groupd on the sporting shift and had to be a multi-dimensional benefit package in order for the government to be willing to underwrite the whole venture. A successful Games would contain untold benefits not only to the capital but the country as a whole Baroness Valentine eluded to this when she said the 2012 Games offer a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to transmute an exhilarating but rundown part of London and, most importantly, transform the lives of people who find themselves excluded from Londons booming economy (Evening banner March, 2007).Those who were opposed to hosting the Games focused on the negative experiences of the cities who ha d made huge losings in the past and the fact that the direct benefits would only be felt by those in London and the surrounding area (with the notable exception of the sailing venue). Many highlighted the ideological vision of inclusion and opportunity for all as being undermined by the way that little consideration had patently been disposed(p) to hosting more of the events away from the capital and the financial sum that this event might have on the United Kingdom as a whole. Glyptis (1989) comments that when looking back on major events such as the Olympics, intimately all provision had been made on the basis of assumed need and assumed benefit which was rarely backed by evidence. Pete Wishat, Scottish superpatriotic Member of Parliament for North Tayside voiced concerns when he said I am strongly opposed to the UK taxpayer underwriting the entire cost, ensureless of what that cost my at long last be and particularly when there is a very real riskiness of the London bid soaking up lottery funding from Scotland and elsewhere in the UK (Daily Telegraph declination, 2003). The experiences of the problems with the Millennium Dome also loomed large in peoples minds with regard to the eventual use of the facilities that were proposed for the Olympic Park. They did not want to have a financial millstone around their neck. They also voiced their concerns over the legacy that would be left how could guarantees be given with regard to not only the facilities but also the sporting legacy for elite athletes and benefits to the nation as a whole through increased participation?Supporters of the event held a different and ultimately successful count increasingly sports events are part of a broader strategy aimed at natural elevation the profile of a city and therefore success cannot be judged on simply a profit and loss basis (Gratton, Henry, 2001 P 36). The National Heritage Committee (1995) stated that it is clear that bids to stage major sporting events c an operate as a catalyst to stimulate economic regeneration even if they do not ultimately prove successful. They force upon the experiences of the organisers of the Manchester Commonwealth Games who were left with a superb legacy in terms of urban regeneration, better sporting facilities for all and increased employment opportunities. The Games are a shot in the arm for the UK economy at this awkward time, offering jobs on the Olympic Park for the previously unemployed and millions of pounds worthy of contracts for UK businesses (John Armitt, www.london2012.com). The lasting effects of a venture such as this can be seen above through the experiences of Manchester following the hosting of the Commonwealth Games.The Western berth (2005) stated that while other nations boasted of their ability to run a smoothen Games, Lord Coes team told the world how much it would mean to the rising of this country and the Olympic movement if London was given the opportunity to stage the 2012 G ames. Lord Coe continued the theme of legacy when he said were serious about inspiring young people because they will be touched most directly by our Games (The Mirror July, 2005). There is also the feel good factor of improved mood and morale in the country which can never be underestimated, as was evidenced by the huge crowds for the parade held in London for the medallists from the Beijing Olympics even though they are not present at a sports event, millions may gain benefits of this nature from it (Gratton, Henry 2001 P 31). Many more can be reached as a result of the influence of the media and the blanket coverage that an event such as this receives and this has been a factor which has made sport further more important to all nations in recent years (Houlihan 1997). This has the effect of enhancing the market benefits to the cities (Gratton, Henry 2001 P 37) in terms of business investment and tourism and it also enables millions to be inspired by the efforts of others to par ticipate in sport themselves.Overall the evidence that is available covering recent major sporting events would indicate that there will be a positive legacy for both London and the UK as a whole in hosting this event, as the real value of the games comes from being associated with the Olympic image (Burbank Andranovich Heyling Rienner 2001 P1). The plans that have been drawn up for the urban redevelopment, the creation of employment opportunities, increased tourism as well as the benefits of increased participation in sport, on board better facilities for the cultivation of elite athletes should bring the legacy for which the organisers are hoping. They reflect the idea that there must be an investment in the future if there are to be long term benefits across a variety of areas for the benefit of the largest amount of people possible.The implications of hosting an event like the Olympics for elite athletes and the general public are enormous. The elite athletes need world class f acilities in which to train and prepare for major events and more recently the government has sought to narrow the focus of sport policy, giving priority to a more limited range of sports and concentrating on youth/school sport and elite development (Houlihan 1997 P 46). This will have the dual effect of producing the elite athletes of the future, while providing for the people who are at the top of their elect field now. This follows the idea that sport is for all and that all should be provided with the opportunity to fulfil their full potential. A glowing example of this effect is the success of the British Cycling team in the Beijing Olympics. Having been able to utilise the velodrome in Manchester (specifically constructed for the Commonwealth Games in 2002) as a training base and centre of excellence, their results in both the Olympics and the recent World Championships have been staggering. They not only reflect well on the government in terms of their investment but also in terms of the kudos that such results bring to the country as a whole. This in turn has brought a feel good factor to the cycling community, to the city of Manchester where the team is found and has had an effect on the amount of people who are enquiring about alive(p) in cycling. The investment in elite athletes who achieve success can have a direct effect on the numbers of those who are wishing to run short involved with any given sport. Another spiral off from this is the training and subsequent employment of coaches within sport to comfort the talent that is emerging as a result of increased participation.increase funding to train coaches also has the effect of helping sport at the grassroots level. The more coaches that are available, the more people can be involved in the enjoyment of their chosen activity as a part of the community community sporting capacity will be improved in a number of ways, such as training and development of volunteers, leaders and coaches (Londo n 2012 Community Sports legacy, www.sportengland,org.uk ). There is a chance to provide excluded groups with opportunities for participation and inclusion (Bradford MDC 1997). There is also the opportunity to increase the speech pattern that is being laid on sport in schools and for the youth of Britain, in order to foster the idea of a healthy lifestyle in terms of both physical activity and the way that people regard their health.Media coverage of the event will also have the effect of guardianship sport in the public eye in a positive way, highlighting the benefits of a healthy lifestyle and encouraging people to become involved in sport. They have a responsibility to continually highlight the facilities that are available, how to be able to contact the national organising bodies for each sport in Britain and the benefits of becoming involved in sporting activity.The success of the Games will, in part, be measured by the increase in ordinary people taking exercise at new sport s facilities (Evening Standard 2007). Only long term study will reveal the full extent of the effect of the Games on sport as there needs to be a sustained long term effect rather than a flutter in the pan.Clearly the UK government and the organisers of the London Games hope that the legacy of the Games will be twofold. Physically they will bequeath a redeveloped area in and around the Olympics site the Games are meant to deliver a more sporting nation (Evening Standard 2008). The former will be much easier to assess in the short term the latter will need to be looked at over the months and years following the Games.BibliographyBurbank, M Andranovich, G. D Heyling, C.H Rienner, L. 2001 Olympic DreamsThe Impact of Mega Events on Local Politics Boulder, CO Lynne RiennerGlyptis 1989 Leisure and Unemployment Milton Keynes OUPGratton, C Henry, I. 2001 Sport in The City The Role of Sport in scotch and Social Regeneration London RoutledgeHoulihan, B 1997 Sport, Policy and Politics A Com parative Analysis London RoutledgeRoche, M 2000 Mega-events and Modernity Olympics and Expos in The harvest-home of Global Culture New York RoutledgeBradford Metropolitan District Council Recreation instalment 1997 A Strategy For Sport and Recreation A Framework and point PrinciplesNational Heritage Committee 1995 Bids to Stage International Sporting Events twenty percent Report House of Commons London HMSODaily Telegraph December 29, 2003 from www.telegraph.co.ukEvening Standard November 22, 2006 Monster Truck Races, Dilapidated stands and a one million million million Dollar Debt that after 30 Years Will Finally Be Paid This Month The Warning We in London Must every(prenominal) Heed From The Montreal OlympicsEvening Standard March 1, 2007 MPs and Peers Poised For disgust over 2012 Raid on Lottery FundsEvening Standard May 15, 2007 The Councils Who Are Failing to Make London Fit for 2012 Games Boroughs not Investing in FacilitiesEvening Standard May 15, 2008 The Real Legacy of The OlympicsThe Mirror July 7, 2005 London Olympics 2012 Our Golden Generation Lord Coe Winning The Games For London Can Bring Kids Back To SportWestern Mail July 7, 2005 chromatography column Comment on Olympic Games Which Can Be A master For Us Allwww.gameslegacy.co.ukwww.london2012.comwww.olympics.org.ukwww.sportengland.org