Introduction To Ethics Essay

Ethics is the study of the nature of object lesson virtues and evaluates benevolent actions. Ethics come from agreements between people, duty considerations and considerations of the consequences of various actions we c solely(a) for ourselves into. Philosophical ethics is the study of morality through rational core guided in human well-being. The three subsections of philosophical ethics argon normative ethics-is the study of moral standards that makes us decide our actions as nip or wrong or good from bad. Meta-ethics is concerned with the meaning of respectable judgments that is responsible for the truth and validity of our actions.Meta-ethics assists us determine whether an conviction set up be applied to any situation at present or in future. It asks questions such as whats the meaning of ethical toll such as good and sort out, the motives for acting ethically, the nature of moral reason. employ Ethics is the application of moral school of thought to real-life si tuations that progress to been investigated in normative ethics and judged on the lessons of meta-ethics. According to Paul Newall article moral philosophy is divided into branches meta-ethics and normative ethics.The two have some differences according to how they ar applied in the day to day reallife situations. prescriptive ethics is concerned with ethical questions that guide us in all what we do on a daily such as What has nurture? and What are our moral covenants? such questions give us our character and witness(prenominal)ity. Meta-ethics on its side is concerned with philosophical questions about ethics such as What is evaluate? and What can make it the case that we ought to do something? . A personal ethical situation I experienced involved my neighbor who was caught theft neighbor at the market place.Since police officers were non around to keep back him the clique took the chance to bit and stone him in protest. Being a person I had known over a period of ti me, I felt ethically right to save his live from the swelling crush. At first, I had to stop the mob from spiny and stoning him, through dialogue. and my greatest fear was that the mob may turn and direct their fury towards me because I was protecting to protect a criminal who has been terrorizing them, moreover this did not happen since the crowd listened and accepted my request.In my opinion, it was ethically wrong for my neighbor to purloin what others had ethically through struggle and hard work. He consequently deserved to be punished, but the way the mob chose to punish the offender was totally unethical since the federal rectitudes and regulations that govern the state should be followed in such a case. Being a chuck up the spongee tricky situation, I requested the mob first to stop any still biting and stoning and took the chance to dialogue and discuss with them other possible ways of punishing the offender such as taking him to the law officers.The mob seemed no t to reason ethically at first because the police had in many cases fallen short of providing adequate security and the residents had no faith in them anymore. When I finally won them, I narrowed further to the issue of acting contrary to the state laws and the implications of their actions and even explained to them that the offender has right to live. The reason for this approach was that the mob seemed to have no moral standards and obligations to judge between good and bad.In many occasion, the mob makes wrong decisions but evaluates their action after an ffence has been committed, in this case the death of my neighbor. In my opinion their action was bad and could not be justified ethically, philosophically the mob morality was not rational and was not grounded in the notion of human happiness for both the accused ad the accusers. According to Newalls translation of normative ethics, several ethical questions essential be questioned by all the participants in the whole proces s. First, my neighbor should have analyzed whether his decision to steal had any moral obligation and any value.Such a personal question should have stopped him from making the decision to steal. His morals could have been provoked and changed of mind taking a decision to engage in a more productive activity rather than stealing. The mob as well should have questioned their morals before choosing their action. By stoning to toss off it implies that their morals were all wrong because it is moral wrong to hurt anyone. The law is very clear and precise on what should be done in such a case, but because they never followed the law their moral value are as well questionable.My action was guided by the value of life and that no one is supposed to take the law into their own hands by causing bodily harm to anybody. My moral obligation was to safe my neighbor because if I watched him stoned to death, my moral conscience and quit would haunt me because I should have acted to save him. In c onclusion, all our actions and decisions should be guided by our morals values and that normative ethics must always prevail in any action. We are supposed to to the full evaluate our actions and be ready to face the consequences of our actions.